Mobile Application Security Services for Confident Releases

Mobile application security testing evaluates an iOS or Android app for weaknesses that could expose users, data, credentials, or connected systems. Vynox assesses compiled binaries through static, dynamic, and runtime analysis, including reverse engineering and certificate pinning bypass where appropriate. Testing covers local storage, transport security, authentication, token handling, API interaction, embedded AI features, and practical exploitability.

No. Vynox can test compiled iOS and Android applications through reverse engineering and runtime instrumentation, so a source-code handoff is not required for a mobile application pentest. If your team wants deeper coverage before release, a separate source code review can examine implementation-level issues, affected files, and remediation opportunities that may not be reachable through black-box testing.

A typical mobile application pentest is delivered in 5–10 business days. The final timeline depends on the number of apps, platforms, user roles, connected APIs, authentication flows, and whether embedded AI capabilities are in scope. Vynox can use a 30-minute discovery call to define the target scope, recommended engagement tier, deliverables, and an accurate timeline before testing begins.

A mobile pentest can identify insecure local data storage, hard-coded secrets, credential or token leakage, weak TLS configuration, certificate pinning weaknesses, insecure API authentication, authorization flaws, exposed application logic, and reverse-engineering risks. For apps containing AI features or on-device models, testing also investigates whether models can be extracted or whether mobile inputs create pathways to AI-specific attacks.

Yes. Vynox provides security testing for both iOS and Android applications. The assessment uses platform-appropriate static, dynamic, and runtime techniques to inspect compiled binaries and validate vulnerabilities in realistic conditions. Testing can cover one platform or both, helping teams identify differences in storage, transport, authentication, permissions, and API behavior before a release or security review.

Yes. Vynox produces reports designed for engineers and leadership, with technical findings, evidence screenshots, CVSS scores, reproduction steps, and remediation guidance. Relevant findings can be mapped to SOC 2 and ISO 27001 control evidence requirements, helping teams respond to auditor requests and customer security questionnaires. Vynox provides penetration testing evidence, not certification or audit services.

An automated scan identifies known patterns and configuration issues, but it cannot reliably validate business logic, chained attack paths, runtime behavior, or whether a finding is genuinely exploitable. Vynox uses manual, expert-led testing with AI-augmented tooling and human validation. This approach examines the application as an attacker would and produces evidence-backed findings with practical remediation rather than raw scanner output.

Yes. Retesting confirms whether remediation resolves the reported vulnerability without introducing a related weakness. Under Vynox’s PTaaS model, fixes deployed to staging can be verified the same day, allowing validation to align with engineering sprints. This continuous approach is useful for teams that release frequently or need current security evidence beyond a single annual point-in-time assessment.